Algognostic Diagnosis: The Myth of “Courage to Fail”

Starting Point

The phrase “I have the courage to fail” is often celebrated in seminars and trainings.
Pedagogical and psychological models – such as error-based learning or Carol Dweck’s Growth Mindset – support the idea that mistakes foster new neural connections and sustainable learning.
Participants are encouraged to experiment, to make errors in safe spaces, and to learn from feedback.

The algognostic question is: what structure of responsibility and clarity is created when “courage to fail” becomes the guiding principle of learning?

Continue reading “Algognostic Diagnosis: The Myth of “Courage to Fail””

Rethinking: Courage – Why Leaders Must Cultivate a New Perspective on Bravery

„Rethink courage: from impulse to intelligent action.“

The Rethinking Impulse as a RethinkAudio – Listen. Reflect. Analyze. Advance.

What it’s all about

Courage is a term frequently overused, romanticised, or misrepresented in leadership discourse. It is often mistaken for sheer audacity, conflated with reckless bravado, or reduced to an unwavering hardness. The prevailing narrative portrays the courageous leader as one who confronts risk with unflinching resolve, makes unilateral decisions, recoils from no confrontation, and betrays no sign of vulnerability. In many executive spheres, courage is celebrated as a virtue of fearlessness, an emblem of unwavering self-confidence, and an indisputable marker of a leader’s capacity to impose their will in the face of adversity.

Continue reading “Rethinking: Courage – Why Leaders Must Cultivate a New Perspective on Bravery”