Self-doubt in managers: Understanding, effects and solutions

What it’s all about

Managers are under constant scrutiny and immense pressure as they are expected to lead their teams effectively, make strategic decisions and consistently deliver high performance. Despite their often impressive skills and achievements, they are not immune to self-doubt. These doubts can significantly impact both their own effectiveness and that of their team. This article explores the origins of self-doubt in leaders, highlights its negative effects and outlines effective strategies to overcome it.

Origins of self-doubt in managers

The sources of self-doubt are many and deep-rooted. One of the main factors is the perfectionism that drives many leaders. These people often set extremely high standards for themselves and others that are difficult to achieve. The constant pressure to be perfect leads to endless self-criticism and the feeling of never being good enough. Perfectionism can lead to a vicious circle in which every perceived mistake is seen as a personal failure, which further increases self-doubt.

Another significant factor is comparison with others. In today’s connected world, the successes of other leaders are constantly present, whether through social media or professional publications. Constant visibility can easily lead to a feeling of inferiority, especially when comparing one’s own success with the seemingly effortless success of others. This pressure to compare often causes managers to devalue their own performance and doubt their competence.

A lack of recognition also plays an important role. Leaders whose achievements are rarely recognised or positively highlighted often begin to doubt their worth and competence. Without regular feedback and confirmation, the feeling of insecurity continues to grow. Furthermore, mistakes and failures that are not dealt with constructively reinforce these insecurities. Dealing with failure is critical; when leaders fixate on their failures instead of learning from them, this develops a deep-rooted fear of failure that feeds their self-doubt.

Effects of self-doubt on leaders and teams

Self-doubt has far-reaching negative consequences. One of the most obvious is weakness in decision-making. Managers who doubt themselves tend to delay decisions or not make them at all. This insecurity paralyses decision-making, which impairs the ability of the entire organisation to act.

Furthermore, the development of innovative approaches suffers from the burden of self-doubt. Managers who constantly doubt themselves avoid taking risks and stick to tried and tested methods for fear of failure. This risk aversion can significantly reduce an organisation’s ability to innovate and jeopardise its competitive advantage.

In the long term, persistent self-doubt can lead to burnout. The emotional pressure caused by constant self-criticism and the pursuit of unattainable goals is enormous and exhausting. Burnout not only affects the manager concerned, but also the entire team, which suffers from the lack of leadership.

The behaviour of an insecure manager has other direct negative effects on the team. Employees who suffer from insecure leadership often lose confidence and motivation themselves. The manager’s insecurity and procrastination are transmitted, which weakens productivity and general morale.

Approaches to overcoming self-doubt

A conscious and structured approach is required to effectively overcome self-doubt. Self-reflection and acceptance are crucial first steps. Managers should regularly take time to objectively assess their own strengths and weaknesses. It is important to accept mistakes and see them as learning opportunities rather than castigating yourself for them. This attitude promotes healthy self-confidence and makes it easier to deal with failure.

Another effective approach is to exchange ideas with mentors or professional coaches. These can open up new perspectives and help them to correctly assess and recognise their achievements. Mentoring and coaching offer a valuable external perspective that often helps to relativise and overcome self-doubt.

Realistic goal setting is also an important factor. Instead of striving for perfection, managers should set themselves achievable goals that are then realised step by step. This approach enables a regular sense of achievement and boosts self-confidence. Small, continuous successes are motivating and help to develop a healthy self-image.

Training to strengthen resilience is also helpful in dealing better with setbacks and seeing them as opportunities for improvement. Resilient managers are able to use challenges and failures in a positive way and emerge stronger from them.

Finally, it is crucial to create a supportive environment. An open communication culture and a supportive team can help to minimise self-doubt and convey a sense of security. An environment that does not condemn mistakes but sees them as learning opportunities promotes trust and cooperation.

Conclusion

Self-doubt is a common challenge for leaders, but it can be overcome with the right approach. By understanding the causes and applying the strategies described above in a targeted manner, managers can learn to overcome their self-doubt. Whilst this requires patience and often professional support, with the right approach it is possible to become a more confident and effective leader. Ultimately, not only the managers themselves, but also their teams and the entire organisation benefit from solid and confident leadership.

Reflect. Analyze. Advance.
Reflect. Analyze. Advance.

Further reading

  • Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241-247.
  • Hutchins, H. M. (2015). Outing the imposter: A study exploring imposter phenomenon among higher education faculty. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 27(2), 3-12.
  • Sakulku, J., & Alexander, J. (2011). The imposter phenomenon. International Journal of Behavioral Science, 6(1), 73-92.
  • Clance, P. R. (1985). The imposter phenomenon: Overcoming the fear that haunts your success. Peachtree Pub Ltd.
  • Vergauwe, J., Wille, B., Feys, M., De Fruyt, F., & Anseel, F. (2015). Fear of being exposed: The trait-relatedness of the imposter phenomenon and its relevance in the work context. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(3), 565-581.
  • Neureiter, M., & Traut-Mattausch, E. (2016). An inner barrier to career development: Preconditions of the imposter phenomenon and consequences for career development. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 48.
  • Clance, P. R., Dingman, D., Reviere, S. L., & Stober, D. R. (1995). Impostor phenomenon in an interpersonal/social context: Origins and treatment. Women & Therapy, 16(4), 79-96.
  • Cozzarelli, C., & Major, B. (1990). Exploring the validity of the impostor phenomenon. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(4), 401-417.
  • Topping, M. E. H., & Kimmel, E. B. (1985). The imposter phenomenon: Feeling phony. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 213-226.
  • Hutchins, H. M., & Rainbolt, H. (2017). What triggers imposter phenomenon among academic faculty? A critical incident study exploring antecedents, coping, and development opportunities. Human Resource Development International, 20(3), 194-214.

Note: We use the assistance of artificial intelligence to increase the structural readability of our texts, to optimise content for users, for the quality management of formal aspects and to generate attractive, context-appropriate images. In addition, AI helps us to analyse reader feedback, adapt to trends and continuously improve our content in order to always offer you the best possible reading experience.