The Architecture of Future Thinking
A Rethinking Impulse by Klaus-Dieter Thill
The digitalization of medical practice offers a wide array of opportunities yet confronts German GPs and specialists with deeply rooted psychological and subconscious barriers, primarily revolving around adverse experiences and perceived risks. This negative focus arises from a complex interplay of cognitive and emotional mechanisms, shaped by specific professional and personal conditioning.
In an era of rapid transformations in the healthcare sector, efficient management alone is no longer sufficient to run a practice. Instead, medical practices that wish to sustainably combine high-quality patient care with a financially stable operation must be based on principles that extend beyond short-term planning, focusing on long-term success and adaptability. The term Future-Oriented Imperatives (FOI) describes exactly this approach: a forward-looking practice management strategy that positions the doctor not only as a medical professional but also as a visionary and manager of their practice landscape. This holistic approach comprises several action areas that form the foundation of a sustainable, resilient, and dynamically operating practice. At the same time, it identifies future challenges that practice owners must face in an increasingly complex and digitised healthcare system. However, benchmarking analyses of practice management reveal that only around 20% of German practice owners have engaged with the topic and its implementation. These include:
Developing an overarching practice vision is the core of any future-oriented practice management. This vision is not merely an abstract formulation, but serves as a strategic guide that unites all key aspects of the practice – medical excellence, operational efficiency, and patient-centred care. Clear medium- and long-term objectives are vital in this regard.
In a healthcare system where technological, societal, and health policy conditions are constantly changing, the ability to respond to long-term developments such as digitalisation, demographics, or new treatment methods is essential. Without a solid and reliable vision, a practice owner risks losing direction in the swirl of changes and weakening their innovation capacity.
Growth does not merely mean establishing new partnerships, opening new locations, or expanding the range of services, but rather the systematic and strategic increase of practice capacities in line with the Future-Oriented Imperatives. This includes collaboration with other healthcare providers, leveraging synergistic potentials, and scaling organisational efficiency.
The growth of a practice, balancing between regulatory constraints and rising patient demands, is a delicate task. Doctors must not only consider economic aspects but also ensure that growth does not compromise medical quality and individual patient care. Maintaining this balance will become increasingly challenging, especially in an over-regulated market environment.
Handing over a practice, in whatever form, is not merely an administrative act but a forward-looking step designed to secure the sustainability of established structures. A well-thought-out and timely succession plan ensures that the practice continues to thrive after the founder retires, even in a changing medical landscape.
The upcoming generational shift in healthcare puts the issue of succession planning at the centre of strategic considerations. Identifying a suitable successor with not only medical but also entrepreneurial qualities will be one of the greatest challenges in the coming years.
Introducing and strategically using technological innovations – from telemedicine and artificial intelligence to digital patient records – is a fundamental requirement for running a modern practice successfully. Innovation should not only be limited to technological advancements but also revolutionise organisational and patient-related processes.
In an increasingly digital environment, doctors must not only understand technological changes but also actively shape them. It is crucial to meaningfully integrate technological tools into practice workflows to improve efficiency while maintaining individual patient care. The costs of implementation and the need for ongoing technical adaptations present major challenges.
Continuous monitoring of changes in health policy frameworks, reimbursement systems, and market structures is a central task of future-oriented practice management. A strategic approach to these factors allows practices to flexibly respond to new challenges and stay on course.
The growing regulatory pressure and changes to reimbursement systems require a high degree of strategic adaptability. Practice owners must develop new business models and keep their practice structures flexible to meet changing market demands.
Long-term successful practice management requires doctors to stay up-to-date not only in medical terms but also to continuously expand their leadership skills and organisational knowledge. Furthermore, the doctor’s personal well-being is a critical factor in practice management, often neglected.
The future will be characterised by increasing workloads and growing pressure on the healthcare sector. Doctors who do not develop proactive strategies to cope with these demands risk not only jeopardising their practice in the long term but also their own health. Burnout and stress management will increasingly come into focus, as only resilient and well-managed practices can remain successful in the long run.
A modern practice must increasingly face its social responsibilities. This includes environmentally friendly practice solutions as well as a commitment to social justice. Sustainability is not understood as an abstract concept but as an integral part of practice management.
The pressure to implement sustainable and environmentally friendly processes will continue to grow in the coming years. Doctors must address topics such as energy efficiency, waste reduction, and socially responsible actions to make their practices future-proof while simultaneously making a positive contribution to society.
The future of practice management requires a deep understanding and strategic integration of the Future-Oriented Imperatives. They not only provide a blueprint for sustainable and innovative practice development but also ensure that doctors face the challenges of the coming years not only reactively but proactively and with vision. Those who address these imperative fields today lay the foundation for long-term resilience, flexibility, and success in the dynamic healthcare landscape.
Medical professional associations make an invaluable contribution to the ongoing education of their members. Conferences, seminars, and workshops continually provide practising doctors with the latest medical knowledge, technologies, and treatment methods. This focus on medical expertise is essential, yet it only covers part of what is required for effective practice management in today’s world.
A frequently overlooked but urgently needed component of medical education is strategic practice management in the field of Future-Oriented Imperatives (FOI).
While medical knowledge develops exponentially and flows into continuing education, the area of practice management remains largely neglected. Doctors are increasingly confronted with complex challenges that go far beyond mere patient care – from digitalisation and changing patient demands to legal frameworks and economic considerations. Practice management benchmarking shows a glaring deficit in all medical disciplines in this regard.
Strategic management of a medical practice is more than just organisation and personnel management. It involves a holistic view of all processes – from patient communication and internal collaboration to financial planning. Strategic practice management means acting proactively, minimising risks, and optimising potential. It ensures that the practice remains stable in the long term and is prepared for future changes.
Doctors who ignore this knowledge and focus solely on optimising their medical skills risk losing ground in key areas. While the quality of medical care is undeniably the heart of any practice, the management of the practice as a business plays an equally significant role in thriving in a dynamic healthcare system. It is the medium through which doctors’ and their teams’ competencies are channelled into patient care.
Practice management benchmarking, as increasingly offered in medical education, highlights deficits in this area: although doctors possess excellent medical skills, they often lack business knowledge and strategic planning. These deficits lead to:
Doctors who focus solely on optimising their medical expertise risk losing competitiveness in the long run. In an increasingly regulated and technologically evolving sector, it is no longer enough to be professionally up-to-date. Practices must be seen as businesses prepared for change and able to respond proactively. Ignoring strategic practice management, however, may lead to significant disadvantages in the future:
It is clear that it is time to implement a rethinking in medical education. Medical professional associations must expand their offerings to equip their members to manage their practices not only medically but also strategically. Only in this way can they meet the growing demands of the healthcare system and place their practices on a stable, future-proof foundation.
Strategic practice management should therefore become a permanent part of medical education – not as a “nice to have” but as an indispensable component of holistic training that encompasses both medical and business skills. Only those who master both areas will be able to meet the complex challenges of the future and successfully manage their practices in the long term.
We use artificial intelligence to enhance the structural readability of our texts, optimise content for users, ensure the quality management of formal aspects, and generate attractive, context-appropriate images. Additionally, AI helps us analyse reader feedback, respond to trends, and continuously improve our content to provide you with the best possible reading experience.
Aggression and assaults by patients towards doctors and medical staff are, unfortunately, not rare occurrences. The trend towards this is currently increasing dramatically, particularly in the German healthcare system. These behaviours can range from verbal attacks to physical assaults and pose a serious challenge for the affected staff and the entire medical team. Understanding the psychological principles and mechanisms that lead to such behaviours is crucial for interpreting and ultimately managing these situations. This article is dedicated to analysing the psychological basis of aggression and assaults in a medical context.
When GPs or specialists carry out a practice management comparison that includes an employee survey, a remarkable phenomenon is repeatedly revealed: if the practice owners are sceptical before the survey begins that there will be any responses at all and assume that staff participation will be low, exactly the opposite occurs: The workforce always participates fully and, what’s more, individual employees submit an average of five pages of suggestions for change. This behaviour reflects deep psychological mechanisms associated with frustration, anger and the feeling of not being heard. The following article explores the deep psychological underpinnings of this behaviour and the psychological profile of practice owners that foster such dynamics.
In the healthcare sector, the interaction between doctors and their staff plays a central role in the success of a practice. Nevertheless, the results of practice management comparisons show that the majority of German doctors in private practice ignore their employees’ suggestions for change or give them little commitment. This behaviour, known as “change aversion”, is deeply rooted in the psychological structures and dynamics that operate in the professional environment.
Internal communication between practice management and employees plays a central role in medical practices. In this context, systemic questions offer a particularly effective method for promoting a deeper understanding of interrelationships, enabling new perspectives and strengthening the personal responsibility of employees. But what exactly are systemic questions, what types of questions are there and how can they be used effectively in everyday practice?
In outpatient care in Germany, the trend has manifested itself of attributing problems that affect general practitioners and specialists in private practice monocausally to external factors such as bureaucratisation, digitalisation or a shortage of specialists. This externalisation of problem solutions, often accompanied by a monocausal argument, has numerous negative effects on the development of progress in outpatient patient care.
Continue reading “The vicious circle of externalisation in German outpatient care”
The German healthcare system is a complex, constantly changing system that presents practice owners with a variety of challenges. In this context, key performance indicators (KPIs) for practice management provide essential guidance for managing a practice efficiently, safely, purposefully and successfully in the long term. However, the frequent neglect of these important tools in German medical practices – only a third of practices use KPIs for practice management – harbours a number of significant risks that can have a considerable impact on both practice performance and patient care.
Continue reading “Risky: 2/3 of German GPs and specialists work without practice management KPI”
One aspect of the development opportunities for practice management in German medical practices remains almost unnoticed: positivity. Its absence as a practice value leads to a multitude of barriers that limit the performance potential that can be activated in every respect.
The majority of German GPs and specialists complain about a significant lack of time. However, only very few carry out analyses of the causes. Yet work analyses, in which practice owners document and evaluate their daily activities over a longer period of time (time tracking), show that around a third of the time spent can be saved through reorganisation. This article sheds light on the psychological reasons for the phenomenon of “unwillingness to analyse” and examines the underlying mechanisms.
R2049 