Involving team members in decisions: A guide for managers

What it’s all about

In modern management, involving team members in decision-making processes is often seen as key to increasing motivation, commitment and ultimately the performance of the entire team. But the question of up to what point a manager should involve their team members in decisions and at what point they should make the decisions themselves is complex and depends on various factors. This article details how leaders can find and maintain this balance.

The benefits of team member involvement

When team members are involved in decision-making processes,

  • they feel valued and an important part of the team. This increases intrinsic motivation and leads to greater commitment. An engaged team is more productive and creative, which has a positive impact on the results of the business and the organisation.
  • collaboration benefits from a broader perspective and different ideas. This results in better and more considered decisions as more information and experience is taken into account.
  • this creates an environment in which team members can freely express their ideas and suggestions, which helps to promote innovation.

When should a manager include team members?

The degree of inclusion strongly depends on the situation. In routine decisions where there is little risk and the impact is limited, broader involvement always makes sense. For strategic decisions with far-reaching consequences, the manager may need to retain more control.

If employees have specific expertise and relevant experience, this should definitely be utilised in order to arrive at more well-founded and practical decisions. A manager should therefore know their team’s expertise inside out and incorporate it into decision-making processes in a targeted manner.

Complex decisions that involve many variables and uncertainties also benefit from the collective intelligence of the team. In such cases, broad involvement results in a more informed analysis of the situation and more robust solutions.

Decisions that affect the entire team, such as changes in working methods or organisational restructuring, should always be made in a participatory process. This contributes to better and faster acceptance and minimises potential resistance.

The limits of team member participation

A participative decision-making process can be time-consuming. In situations that require quick decisions, such as crises or urgent operational matters, the manager must therefore make the decision alone in order to avoid delays and disadvantages.

There are also scenarios in which the manager must give clear instructions and take responsibility. Especially for decisions that involve a high degree of responsibility or risk, it is important that the team leader makes the final decision and takes responsibility.

Too much participation can lead to conflicts or groupthink and the desire for consensus can impair the quality of the decision. Managers must therefore be able to moderate differences of opinion and ensure that decisions are based on solid arguments and not on the urge for unity.

Not all team members are always in a position to make a substantial contribution to every decision. The manager must recognise when the involvement of team members does more harm than good, for example if the necessary knowledge or understanding of the decision is lacking.

Practical approaches to decision-making participation

Consultative leadership

Here, the manager asks their team members for advice before making a decision. This method is well suited to decisions that require expertise and input, but ultimately need to be implemented quickly.

Democratic decision-making

In this method, decisions are made by majority vote. This form of decision-making is particularly suitable for team processes or when there is a choice between several equally valid options.

Delegation

In some cases, the manager can also delegate the decision entirely to a team member or group. This makes sense if the task is well defined and the team member has the necessary expertise and responsibility.

Consensus decisions

A decision is made that is supported by all team members. Although this method is time-consuming, it can be useful for particularly complex or important decisions in order to ensure a high level of acceptance and support.

Conclusion

Involving team members in decisions is an important aspect of modern leadership and can bring numerous benefits to the organisation. However, a manager must be able to find the right balance and know when it makes sense to involve the team and when it is better to make the decision themselves. This requires situational sensitivity, a good understanding of team dynamics and the ability to flexibly apply both participative and authoritative leadership styles. With the right mix of participation and direct leadership, managers can achieve the best results and build a motivated, committed and high-performing team.

Reflect. Analyze. Advance.
Reflect. Analyze. Advance.

Further reading

  • Levi, D. (2017). Group Dynamics for Teams (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Duhigg, C. (2016). What Google Learned From Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team. The New York Times Magazine.
  • Edmondson, A.C. (2012). Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy. Jossey-Bass.
  • Gratton, L. & Erickson, T.J. (2007). 8 Ways to Build Collaborative Teams. Harvard Business Review.
  • Hackman, J.R. (2002). Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Katzenbach, J.R. & Smith, D.K. (1993). The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Lencioni, P. (2002). The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable. Jossey-Bass.
  • Lipman-Blumen, J. & Leavitt, H.J. (2009). Hot Groups: Seeding Them, Feeding Them, and Using Them to Ignite Your Organization. Oxford University Press.
  • Thompson, L.L. (2018). Making the Team: A Guide for Managers (6th ed.). Pearson.
  • Wageman, R., Nunes, D.A., Burruss, J.A. & Hackman, J.R. (2008). Senior Leadership Teams: What It Takes to Make Them Great. Harvard Business School Press.

Note: We use the assistance of artificial intelligence to increase the structural readability of our texts, to optimise content for users, for the quality management of formal aspects and to generate attractive, context-appropriate images. In addition, AI helps us to analyse reader feedback, adapt to trends and continuously improve our content in order to always offer you the best possible reading experience.