Commitment in Leadership: Why It Is So Important and Why It Is Insufficiently Implemented

What It’s About

Commitment is a concept that carries different meanings across various disciplines and plays a central role in leadership. This article examines how commitment influences the behaviour of leaders and employees, and its significance in an evolving and digitalised working world. It also addresses what often prevents managers from acting in a binding manner.

The Philosophical Perspective: Ethics and Responsibility

In philosophy, commitment is often discussed in the context of ethics and responsibility. Here, it means the obligation to remain faithful to moral principles and values. For leaders, this implies that their decisions and actions must align with ethical guidelines. Commitment in this sense requires integrity and honesty, as a leader who acts with commitment is perceived as trustworthy and reliable.

Ethics and responsibility are the cornerstones of committed leadership. An ethically committed leader sets clear expectations, communicates openly, and acts consistently. This consistency fosters trust and respect among employees. Commitment also requires courage, as it often involves making difficult decisions and speaking uncomfortable truths.

The Psychological Perspective: Trust and Relationships

From a psychological viewpoint, commitment plays a crucial role in building and maintaining relationships. In leadership, this means that a leader must be able to establish strong and trustworthy relationships with their employees. Commitment creates a sense of security and stability that is essential for the motivation and well-being of employees.

Trust is at the heart of commitment in leadership. A committed leader keeps their promises and advocates for their employees’ interests. This reliability strengthens employee loyalty and engagement. Psychologically, commitment reduces uncertainty and fear, leading to a more positive work environment and higher productivity.

The Management-Specific Perspective: Efficiency and Effectiveness

In management, commitment is closely linked to efficiency and effectiveness. Committed team leaders set clear goals and expectations, enhancing employee performance and productivity. They ensure that tasks and responsibilities are well-defined and that there are clear guidelines and processes in place.

A committed supervisor creates a culture of accountability and responsibility. This means that employees understand what is expected of them and that their performance is regularly reviewed. Commitment also promotes collaboration and teamwork, as clear expectations and goals improve coordination and communication within the team.

Commitment in a Digitalised Working World

In a rapidly changing and digitalised working world, commitment takes on a whole new meaning. Digitalisation brings new challenges and opportunities for leaders. Commitment will be crucial to thriving in this new environment.

Here, communication transparency is key. Leaders must ensure that they communicate openly and honestly and clearly explain their decisions and actions. This requires a high level of digital competence and the ability to use modern communication tools effectively.

Commitment is also becoming increasingly important in virtual leadership. As more teams work remotely, team leaders need to find ways to foster commitment and trust in virtual environments. This requires a conscious effort, regular virtual meetings, and clear and consistent communication.

The Future Importance of Commitment for Leadership Success

The importance of commitment for a leader’s success will continue to grow in the future. In an ever-changing working world, commitment will be a key skill for building and maintaining trust and loyalty. Supervisors must learn how to act with commitment in a complex and uncertain environment.

Commitment will also play a decisive role in attracting and retaining talent. At a time when skilled workers are becoming increasingly scarce, the ability to demonstrate commitment and create a trusting work environment will be a crucial competitive advantage.

Digitalisation and the increasing interconnectedness of the working world require a new kind of commitment. Leaders must be able to act with commitment and build trust in a digital environment. This requires not only technological competence but also the ability to communicate empathetically and authentically.

Commitment as a Key Skill in Leadership

As described, commitment is a multifaceted concept that plays a central role in leadership. From a philosophical perspective, commitment requires ethical action and responsibility. Psychologically, it is crucial for building trust and stable relationships. In management, commitment is closely linked to efficiency and effectiveness.

In a changing and digitalised working world, commitment is becoming even more important. Leaders must learn how to act with commitment in a complex and uncertain environment. This requires not only technological competence but also the ability to communicate openly and honestly and to build trust.

Commitment will be a key skill for the future success of a leader. It will be crucial for building and maintaining trust and loyalty, attracting and retaining talent, and leading successfully in a digitalised world. Leaders who demonstrate commitment will be able to lead strong and successful teams and meet future challenges.

The Psychological Reasons for Leaders’ Reluctance to Commit

Despite the aspects mentioned, many leaders shy away from being committed. From a psychological perspective, there are various reasons that explain this behaviour. These include the fear of making mistakes, the desire for flexibility, uncertainty about one’s abilities, and the fear of responsibility.

The Fear of Mistakes and Failure

A major reason why leaders hesitate to be committed is the fear of mistakes and failure. Commitment requires leaders to make clear decisions and take responsibility for their actions. This can be daunting, as mistakes or wrong decisions can have serious consequences. Supervisors fear being held accountable for these mistakes and risking their careers.

This fear of mistakes can lead to leaders delaying decisions or remaining vague to keep their options open. Instead of making clear commitments, they prefer to leave room for manoeuvre to respond quickly when needed. However, this uncertainty can undermine employees’ trust and create an atmosphere of ambiguity and instability.

The Desire for Flexibility

Another important factor is the desire for flexibility. In a rapidly changing work environment, team leaders want to remain flexible to respond to unforeseen events. Commitment can be perceived as a limitation of this flexibility, as it involves firm commitments and obligations.

This attitude is particularly prevalent in dynamic industries where market conditions can change rapidly. Supervisors want to ensure that they can adjust their strategies and plans if circumstances change. Therefore, they often avoid making firm commitments to maintain their freedom of action.

Uncertainty About One’s Abilities

Uncertainty about one’s abilities and competencies can also lead individuals in leadership positions to hesitate to commit. Leaders who doubt their competence may not feel capable of making clear decisions and firm commitments. They fear they might not meet expectations and could lose their credibility.

This uncertainty can stem from various sources, including lack of experience, inadequate support, or negative past experiences. Leaders who are unsure of their abilities often prefer to remain vague and avoid making firm commitments to avoid criticism and failure.

The Fear of Responsibility

Commitment also means taking on responsibility. Many leaders shy away from this responsibility because they fear the associated risks and burdens. Committed decisions can have far-reaching consequences and require a high degree of dedication and accountability.

The fear of responsibility can lead leaders to try to delegate or avoid responsibility. They hesitate to make clear commitments because they fear the potential negative outcomes and the associated obligations. This can create a culture of hesitation and uncertainty within the team.

The Need for Control

Another psychological motive is the need for control. Leaders with a strong need for control often avoid making firm commitments because they fear losing control over the situation. Commitment requires them to commit to specific outcomes, which limits their ability to respond flexibly and maintain control over the team or organisation’s dynamics.

These team leaders prefer to keep their options open and adapt their decisions to changing circumstances. They avoid making firm commitments to preserve their freedom of action and control, which can negatively affect trust and stability within the team.

Lack of Trust in the Team

Another reason for reluctance to commit may be a lack of trust in the team. Leaders who do not trust their employees may hesitate to make firm commitments because they fear that the team will not be able to meet them. They are unsure whether the team can deliver the required performance or achieve the set goals.

This uncertainty can lead them to act cautiously and reservedly to protect themselves from potential disappointments and failures. They avoid making firm commitments because they lack confidence in their team’s abilities and dedication.

Cultural and Organisational Factors

Cultural and organisational factors can also play a role. In some corporate cultures, flexibility is valued more highly than commitment. There might be a culture of hesitation and non-commitment, where leaders are not encouraged to make clear commitments.

Organisational structures and processes can also contribute to team leaders avoiding firm commitments. In companies with bureaucratic or hierarchical structures, it can be difficult to make quick and firm decisions. Leaders in such environments may hesitate to make firm commitments because they fear the lengthy and complex decision-making process.

Conclusion

The reluctance of leaders to commit can be explained by a variety of psychological factors. Fear of mistakes and failure, the desire for flexibility, uncertainty about one’s abilities, fear of responsibility, the need for control, lack of trust in the team, as well as cultural and organisational factors, all play a role.

Leaders who want to overcome these barriers must work on their self-confidence and trust in their abilities and their team. It is important to create a culture of trust and openness in which commitment is valued and encouraged. By taking on responsibility and making clear decisions, leaders can strengthen their employees’ trust and loyalty and create a more stable and productive working environment.

Healthy Leadership:
Sustainable Results Through Mental, Organisational and Social Balance.
Reflect. Analyze. Advance.

Further reading

  • Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (1995). Transformational leadership: An initial investigation in sales management. The Journal of Personal Selling Sales Management, 15(2), 17–31
  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89
  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1992). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Short form 6S. Binghamton, NY: Center for Leadership Studies
  • Abasilim, U. D., Gberevbie, D. E., & Osibanjo, O. A. (2019). Leadership styles and employees’ commitment: Empirical evidence from Nigeria. Sage Open, 9(3), 1-15
  • Majid, A., Ehrhardt, K., & Scheible, A. (2019). The influence of leaders’ attitudes and commitment to quality management. International Journal of Human Resource Management
  • Osborn, R., Hunt, J.G., & Jauch, L. (2002). Toward a Contextual Theory of Leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 797–837
  • Mattone, J. (n.d.). Commitment in Leadership Style: Do All Great Leaders Have It? John Mattone Global
  • London Small Business Alliance (2023). The Psychology of Leadership: Understanding What Makes a Good Leader
  • Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D., & Haslam, S.A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 459–478
  • Bass, B.M., & Riggio, R.E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Note: We use the assistance of artificial intelligence to increase the structural readability of our texts, to optimise content for users, for the quality management of formal aspects and to generate attractive, context-appropriate images. In addition, AI helps us to analyse reader feedback, adapt to trends and continuously improve our content in order to always offer you the best possible reading experience.